Would You like a feature Interview?
All Interviews are 100% FREE of Charge
The process of appointing cabinet ministers will become more transparent after the government refused to disclose whether Rishi Sunak rejected official advice not to reappoint Suera Braverman as home minister. Critics said it should.
Braverman resigned last October during Prime Minister Liz Truss’ term, admitting to violating ministerial regulations by sending classified official documents from a personal email account.
But Sunak reinstated her to the interior ministry when she became prime minister a week later, despite opposition concerns that she might pose a risk to national security.
The Cabinet Office is currently Me He did not say whether the prime minister had been told by a civil servant whether it was appropriate to reinstate Brabberman a week after she broke the order.
The response, which even confirmed the existence of any advice, said it would have a “chilling effect” on the “safe space” given to civil servants when advising ministers, and said there was a public interest in disclosing it. rejected the claim.
The way ministers are appointed has come under renewed scrutiny this week following revelations about Nadhim Zahawi’s financial problems, leading to his dismissal yesterday.
Mr Sunak said Wednesday that he knew “nothing was wrong” when he appointed Mr Zahawi as Conservative Party chairman, but that “new information” about his tax regime had emerged over the weekend. .
The prime minister has asked ethics adviser Sir Laurie Magnus to look into the matter, and Lord Laurie said in a report released on Sunday that Mr Zahawi had failed to declare a tax audit during his various appointments to the Code. I discovered that I had violated 7 times.
The lack of information about Mr. Zahawy’s financial arrangements, who knew what and when, added to the mystery surrounding Mr. Zahawy’s case.
Liberal Democrat MP Christine Jardine said of the FOI’s request regarding Ms Braverman: So why does he continue to refuse to release this vital information?
“People need transparency and the Prime Minister has promised that we will be transparent, but the government has not told us anything.
“If Snack dismissed the officials when he appointed Braverman, he broke his promise to ‘rule with integrity’ within minutes of entering Downing Street. What a mess.”
Alex Thomas, former senior civil servant and now program director at the Government Research Institute, said: Create a potential conflict of interest. ”
In its response to the FOI, the Cabinet Office said: Advice that may be offered.
“As a result, the effectiveness of deliberation and decision-making will generally be compromised.
“Furthermore, confirming or denying the existence of information within your request would prejudice the future appointment process and the Prime Minister’s ability to responsibly fulfill his constitutional role as a principal adviser to the sovereign.” It is thought that it will have a significant impact on the organization of the executive branch.
“It’s been a long practice that the government does not comment on advice that the prime minister may or may not have received.”