Would You like a feature Interview?
All Interviews are 100% FREE of Charge
“Despite all the heavy scrutiny of TikTok, it is surprising that Congress has not considered more dramatic action against Chinese fast-fashion giant Shein,” it begins. 52 pages of complaints In the lawsuit, three fashion designers accused the company of “serious” copyright infringement and extortion under the Extortion and Corrupt Organizations Act (RICO).
In a complaint filed Tuesday, the designers accused fast fashion brands of stealing and selling “exact copies” of their creative creations without their consent, and Shane “to create thousands of new pieces.” Alleged to be involved in a systematic” and “criminal” pattern of copyright infringement. everyday items. The complaint alleges that Shane has been doing this since adopting its business model and algorithms around 2017 or 2018.
The lawsuit states that “the criminal behavior may continue indefinitely into the future.”
One of the plaintiffs, Christina Perry, discovered that “brazen copies” of her poster designs were being sold by Shane and another fashion site, Romwe.
“It is incredibly disheartening, demeaning and downright evil to profit from an artist without the artist’s knowledge or permission,” Perry complained through the website’s contact page, after which Shane said: offered the designer $500 on behalf of Shane and Romwe.
“Shayne made an offer as if it were a privately owned business rather than one of the wealthiest companies in the world,” the complaint states.
Even after Perry contacted the company, the company continued to sell copies of her designs, according to the lawsuit.
Two other plaintiffs, Jay Baron and Larissa Brintz, also allege that Shane stole and sold copyrighted designs.
However, Shane’s rep said: entrepreneur The company said it intends to contest the allegations.
A spokesperson for the brand said, “Shein takes all claims of infringement seriously and responds promptly to complaints from legitimate intellectual property owners.” entrepreneur. “We intend to vigorously defend this lawsuit and any and all frivolous claims.”
Related: Sarah Silverman sues OpenAI and Meta for ‘copyright infringement’ after using her work to train AI models
The complaint alleges that Shane’s intellectual property theft and piracy were not isolated incidents, but were part of a long-running, ongoing pattern, partly due to a decentralized corporate structure that makes it difficult to hold specific individuals accountable. claims to promote input: Ricoa law originally designed to combat organized crime.
Plaintiffs allege that Shein is not a single entity, but a complex corporate structure made up of many entities, so that it can “shift the blame” to third parties “as if it were independent.” are doing.
A graph cited in the complaint highlights Shane’s “complex corporate structure.” Public Eye, 2022, (www.PublicEye.ch).
What is RICO? Why is Shane being accused?
Organized crime works by carrying out ongoing illegal activities through a coordinated network of interconnected organizations, making it particularly difficult to trace responsibility. Even if one of her members gets caught, it’s no big deal and the organization could still run its illegal business as usual.
In Shein’s case, the litigation has similarly made it difficult to pinpoint “what exactly Shein is,” and thus who those seeking legal action are targeting. It highlights the “impossibility” of knowing what to do. The complaint says unrepresented victims face a “pretty brick wall” and that even those with lawyers and “strong legal cases” still have difficulty finding the right parties. says they are facing
Imagine trying to solve a puzzle. However, instead of having all the pieces in front of you, they’re scattered across different rooms in a huge sprawling mansion.
In this lawsuit, Shane’s decentralized structure and continued piracy and racketeering constitute a criminal organization parity, and Shayne is held liable for numerous alleged violations under RICO. The lawsuit alleges that it is possible. Straddling that “disorganized corporate structure”.
Related article: Twitter sued for $500 million in unpaid severance payments by laid-off employees