Would You like a feature Interview?
All Interviews are 100% FREE of Charge
Just when Rishi Sunak thought he might have cleaned up the last mess left by his predecessor Boris Johnson, he discovered more problems to deal with under the carpet.
In its infamous special report, the Privileges Committee singled out several Mr Johnson mobsters for trying to “denounce” the committee’s credibility, influencing four Conservative MPs who were members of the committee. accused of trying to give
Among those named are die-hard Johnsonites, Jacob Rhys-Mogg, Nadine Dries, Pretty Patel, Andrea Jenkins and Michael Fabricant.
The Conservative Democrats, a pro-Johnson grassroots group that led the attack on the Commission, even created an email template for activists to attack the Conservative Party in an attempt to influence the Commission. I’m also researching the names of nobles, especially Lord Crudas. intimidate them.
As for action, the committee is left to the House to decide what is needed to protect the current and future integrity of Congressional committees. The Act is a first instance, in which members of Parliament decide what sanctions, if any, should be imposed on members of Congress who the government has introduced a motion in the House of Commons to discredit the work of the committee. says it should be possible.
In doing so, another big problem piles up on Mr. Sunak’s shoulders. As a tenth placer who promised to restore his integrity, he must now decide whether to further punish the faction he least likes.
It must also decide whether to retain Lord Goldsmith, who called the commission the ‘Kangaroo Court’, as a Cabinet member.
If he fails to seize the initiative, any member of Congress can introduce a motion. His failure to submit an opinion on the commission’s report has led to accusations of “weakness” and he will now have to decide whether to take further action.
Failure to do so will lead to further suspicions that he is too weak to stand against his own party. A failure to remove Lord Goldsmith would seriously question his claim to bring “honesty, professionalism and accountability” to the government.